Why Doesn’t Archaeology Corroborate Every Detail of the New Testament Accounts?

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

178When trying to establish the reliability of eyewitnesses in cold case investigations, I use a template that I learned from criminal trials (I’ve written about this at length in my book). One of the four areas I examine is whether or not an eyewitness account can be verified in some way by outside evidence that corroborates the claims of the witness. Detectives are usually able to locate DNA, fingerprint, or other forensic evidence that validates and affirms the statement offered by a witness (sometimes an additional witness is even used to verify a statement). But what about historic eyewitness accounts that were recorded so long ago that forensic evidence is no longer available? Well, here’s where I think archeology can step into the gap to help us substantiate the claims of ancient eyewitnesses.

I’ve written online about some of the archeological evidence that supports the claims made by Luke in the Book of Acts (I’ve written more on this in Cold Case Christianity), but it’s clear from any authority on Biblical archeology that we don’t have support for every detail of the gospels. Critics often cite this reality as a challenge for those of us who claim the gospels are accurate. But let’s take a minute to compare the state of Biblical archeological support with the state of Mormon archeological support. Both the New Testament and the Book of Mormon make claims about the ancient past that can be verified with archeological discoveries. But while the Biblical narrative has been robustly (although incompletely) confirmed with archeology, the Book of Mormon narrative has not been corroborated by a single archeological discovery. Not a single Mormon city has been discovered. Not a single Mormon artifact. Not a single inscription bearing a name from the Mormon narrative. Christianity does not suffer from such a complete absence of archeological confirmation.

But what are we to say to those who argue the Biblical archeological record is incomplete? The answer is best delivered by another expert witness in the field, Dr. Edwin Yamauchi, historian and Professor Emeritus at Miami University. Yamauchi wrote a book entitled, The Stones and the Scripture, where he rightly noted that archaeological evidence is a matter of “fractions”:

Only a fraction of the world’s archaeological evidence still survives in the ground.

Only a fraction of the possible archaeological sites have been discovered.

Only a fraction have been excavated, and those only partially.

Only a fraction of those partial excavations have been thoroughly examined and published.

Only a fraction of what has been examined and published has anything to do with the claims of the Bible!

Despite limits, we still have a robust collection of archaeological evidences confirming the narratives of the New Testament (both in the gospel accounts and in the Book of Acts). Click To Tweet

See the problem? In spite of these limits, we still have a robust collection of archaeological evidences confirming the narratives of the New Testament (both in the gospel accounts and in the Book of Acts). We shouldn’t hesitate to use what we do know archaeologically in combination with other lines of evidence. Archaeology may not be able to tell us everything, but it can help us fill in the circumstantial case as we corroborate the gospel record.

For more information about the reliability of the New Testament gospels and the case for Christianity, please read Cold-Case Christianity: A Homicide Detective Investigates the Claims of the Gospels. This book teaches readers ten principles of cold-case investigations and applies these strategies to investigate the claims of the gospel authors. The book is accompanied by an eight-session Cold-Case Christianity DVD Set (and Participant’s Guide) to help individuals or small groups examine the evidence and make the case.

J. Warner Wallace is a Dateline featured Cold-Case Detective, Senior Fellow at the Colson Center for Christian Worldview, Adj. Professor of Christian Apologetics at Talbot School of Theology, Biola University, author of Cold-Case ChristianityGod’s Crime Scene, and Forensic Faith, and creator of the Case Makers Academy for kids.

Subscribe to J. Warner’s Daily Email

Check Also

Can We Trust the Bible If We Can’t Confirm Every Detail?

Most of the time when a police officer responds to a call from a citizen, …

18 comments

  1. Pingback: Real Clear Apologetics | The Comparatively Rich Archaeological Corroboration of the Old Testament

  2. Pingback: The Comparatively Rich Archaeological Corroboration of the Old Testament | Cold Case Christianity

  3. Pingback: The Comparatively Rich Archaeological Corroboration of the Old Testament | Apologetics ForumApologetics Forum

  4. Pingback: The Comparatively Rich Archaeological Corroboration of the Old Testament | A disciple's study

  5. Pingback: Real Clear Apologetics | A Brief Sample of Archaeology Corroborating the Claims of the New Testament

  6. Pingback: A Brief Sample of Archaeology Corroborating the Claims of the New Testament | Apologetics ForumApologetics Forum

  7. Pingback: From Reliable to Divine: The Fulfilled New Testament Prophecies of Jesus | Cold Case Christianity

  8. Pingback: Why a Christian Response Needs to Be Different Than a Mormon Response | Apologetics ForumApologetics Forum

  9. Pingback: Is Luke's Description of Quirinius Historically Inaccurate?

  10. Pingback: Unbelievable? Is Luke's Description of Quirinius Historically Inaccurate? | Cold Case Christianity

  11. Pingback: From Reliable to Divine: Fulfilled Prophecy in the Old Testament | Cold Case Christianity

  12. Pingback: A Brief Sample of Old Testament Archaeological Corroboration | Cold Case Christianity

  13. Pingback: A Brief Sample of Archaeology Corroborating the Claims of the New Testament | Cold Case Christianity

  14. Pingback: Midweek Apologetics Roundup |

  15. Pingback: Biblical Archeology and Textual Criticism Reference Links | Reasoned Cases for Christ

  16. Pingback: Is There Archaeological Evidence for Abraham? – Cyber Penance

  17. Pingback: Is There Any Archaeological Evidence for Exodus? – Cyber Penance

  18. Pingback: Is There Any Archaeological Evidence for King David? – Cyber Penance

  19. Pingback: Le Patriarche Biblique Abraham a t’il existé ? Le récit de la genèse est il historique ? – Qu’est ce que la vérité ?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *