The Witnesses of the Resurrection Compared to the Witnesses of the Golden Plates

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

125When I first became interested in examining the claims of Christianity, my sister (a member of the LDS Church) encouraged me to investigate the Book of Mormon as well. One aspect of this investigation involved examining the life and testimony of the eyewitnesses. Christianity hinges on the truthfulness of the Resurrection. As Paul said in 1 Corinthians, if the Resurrection didn’t occur as described by the original eyewitnesses, we have been deceived; if the Resurrection did not occur, there is no hope for life after the grave and we, as Christians, are to be pitied. In a similar way, the truthfulness of the Book of Mormon hinges on the validity of the Golden Plates from which it was translated. If the Golden Plates were not real, Mormonism is a lie and Mormons are to be pitied. One way to test the validity of either religious system is simply to examine the testimony and lives of the eyewitnesses. The Christian apostles testified to the Resurrection without wavering; they died a martyr’s death for what they claimed about the Resurrection of Jesus. The original eyewitnesses of the Golden Plates, however, did not have such a noble history. Although these Mormon “eyewitnesses” are still cited in the opening pages of the Book of Mormon as though they were reliable authenticators of the text, all three of these original “eyewitnesses” eventually recanted their story about the Golden Plates:

Oliver Cowdery
Cowdery exposed Joseph Smith’s affair with Fanny Alger and, as a result, was excommunicated from the Mormon Church. Smith described Cowdery as a thief, liar, perjurer, counterfeiter, adulterer and leader of “scoundrels of the deepest degree”. Cowdery eventually became a Methodist and denied the Book of Mormon, publicly stating that he had “sorrow and shame” over his connection with Mormonism.

Martin Harris
Harris was a member of five different religious groups prior to becoming a Mormon and eight different religious groups after leaving Mormonism. Like Cowdery, Harris was also excommunicated from the Mormon Church. He recanted his “eyewitness” testimony related to the Golden Plates and reported that he did not see them as Joseph Smith maintained. Harris instead said that he saw the plates spiritually in a “state of entrancement” after praying for three days.

David Whitmer
Whitmer, like Cowdery and Harris, was eventually excommunicated from the Mormon Church. He declared himself to be a prophet of the New Church of Christ, resulting in condemnation from Joseph Smith who called him a “dumb beast to ride” and an “ass to bray out cursings instead of blessings”. Whitmer later admitted that he saw the Golden Plates “by the eye of faith” rather than with his physical eyes. He waffled repeatedly on the descriptions he offered related to this sighting.

Joseph Smith eventually decided to add additional “eyewitnesses” to his list of authenticators. He added eight more men to his list, limiting his choices to close friends or family members. These men also had difficulty staying true to Mormonism; two apostatized and left the faith and one was excommunicated. Of the five remaining “witnesses” three were blood relatives of Joseph Smith (I’ve written a chapter in Cold-Case Christianity describing the advantage of familial relationships when trying to establish a successful conspiracy).

It’s interesting to note that the original Golden Plate “eyewitnesses” had no less religious fervor following their denial of the plates than they did when they first testified to their existence: they went on to become active members in other religious groups. Interestingly, none of the true eyewitnesses of the Resurrection slipped into any of the patterns we see in the lives of Cowdery, Harris or Whitmer. None of the apostles recanted their stories. None of the apostles later said their observations of the Risen Christ were simply spiritual sightings or visions. None of the apostles left Christianity to become active in other religious groups. None of the apostles were condemned or publicly scorned by the leaders of Christianity. As I examined the lives and behaviors of those who claimed to eyewitnesses to Mormonism and Christianity, my confidence in the claims of Christianity rose as my confidence in the claims of Mormonism fell. We can learn a lot by examining the lives of eyewitnesses.

For more information about the reliability of the New Testament gospels and the case for Christianity, please read Cold-Case Christianity: A Homicide Detective Investigates the Claims of the Gospels. This book teaches readers ten principles of cold-case investigations and applies these strategies to investigate the claims of the gospel authors. The book is accompanied by an eight-session Cold-Case Christianity DVD Set (and Participant’s Guide) to help individuals or small groups examine the evidence and make the case.

J. Warner Wallace is a Dateline featured Cold-Case Detective, Senior Fellow at the Colson Center for Christian Worldview, Adj. Professor of Christian Apologetics at Talbot School of Theology, Biola University, author of Cold-Case ChristianityGod’s Crime Scene, and Forensic Faith, and creator of the Case Makers Academy for kids.

Subscribe to J. Warner’s Daily Email

Check Also

Resisting the Desire to Simply Follow the Rules

As a police officer, I recognize the fact that the world is a dangerous place. …