Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

Cold Case Christianity

God / Theism

The Big Thing About the Big Bang

217I’ve had the privilege and honor of speaking at churches all over the country; and many have asked me to talk about the evidence for God’s existence. As part of this investigation, I invariably discuss the value of Big Bang Cosmology; but I do so with great respect for each group I address. You see, many of us, as Christians, are wary of the Big Bang because we connect it to a larger naturalistic paradigm. Some of us associate Big Bang Cosmology with the secular effort to account for the origin of the universe without the need for a Creator. Our pastors and Sunday School teachers have warned us about the Big Bang, and as a result, many of us are dismissive of the concept before we even examine what it proposes. But the most important aspect of the Big Bang is actually a key evidence for God’s existence. Big Bang Cosmology proposes that everything in the universe came from nothing at a fixed point in the distant past. This point of origin (a cosmological singularity) is entirely consistent with the Christian view of God’s creation as described in Genesis 1; the proposal that “everything came from nothing” is yet another evidence for God’s existence.

Because I am sensitive to the reaction many Christians have when the Big Bang is presented as evidence for (rather than against) God’s existence, I typically begin by carefully delineating what I am not proposing or advocating. Although I accept the reasonable inference that “everything came from nothing”, I reject other naturalistic assertions that are sometimes associated with Big Bang Cosmology:

By Acknowledging the Big Bang, I Am Not Affirming Scientific Naturalism
While I recognize that science can assist us as we examine the physical world for evidence of God’s creative interaction (the same way an examination of a pot can tell us something about the potter), I reject the notion that all physical phenomena must be explained through purely natural laws, causes or forces. I can affirm that “everything came from nothing” without affirming Scientism or Philosophical Naturalism.

By Acknowledging the Big Bang, I Am Not Affirming Darwinian Evolution
In a similar way, my affirmation of Big Bang Cosmology does not require me to accept Evolution as an explanation of biological development. These are two entirely separate proposals, and although some Christians consider them to be united under the banner of secularism or naturalism, I don’t have to embrace any form of evolution in order to accept what the Big Bang proposes related to the origin of the universe.

By Affirming the Big Bang, I Am Not Affirming a Specific Age of the Universe
Finally, and perhaps most importantly for many Christians, Big Bang Cosmology does not necessitate a particular age of the universe. While there are several lines of evidence that point to the fact that “everything came from nothing” at some point in the distant past (i.e. the Second Law of Thermodynamics, the expansion of the universe, the Cosmic Radiation Echo,  and the philosophy of infinite regress), none of these evidences dictate precisely how distant that point in the past must be. I can embrace the inference that “everything came from nothing” without accepting a specific age of the universe; the dating of the universe is another matter altogether. Given important qualifications about what Big Bang Cosmology does (and doesn’t) necessitate, the most important inference (that “everything came from nothing”) is of incredible value. Share on X

Given these important qualifications about what Big Bang Cosmology does (and doesn’t) necessitate, the most important remaining inference (that “everything came from nothing”) is of incredible value to those of us who make the case for God’s existence. Christians aren’t the only folks who understand the implications of Big Bang cosmology. The troublesome inference that “everything came from nothing” continues to haunt naturalists who are now motivated to find an alternative explanation in an effort to avoid the conundrum. Big Bang Cosmology remains, however, the most accepted explanation for the origin of the universe; it is still the “Standard Cosmological Model”. When we, as Christians, refer to the reasonable inference that “everything came from nothing”, we’re not “cherry picking” from the theory; we’re simply focusing on the “big thing” about the Big Bang.

Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.

For more information about the scientific and philosophical evidence pointing to a Divine Creator, please read God’s Crime Scene: A Cold-Case Detective Examines the Evidence for a Divinely Created Universe. This book employs a simple crime scene strategy to investigate eight pieces of evidence in the universe to determine the most reasonable explanation. The book is accompanied by an eight-session God’s Crime Scene DVD Set (and Participant’s Guide) to help individuals or small groups examine the evidence and make the case.

J. Warner Wallace is a Dateline featured Cold-Case Detective, Senior Fellow at the Colson Center for Christian Worldview, Adj. Professor of Christian Apologetics at Talbot School of Theology, Biola University, author of Cold-Case ChristianityGod’s Crime Scene, and Forensic Faith, and creator of the Case Makers Academy for kids.

Subscribe to J. Warner’s Daily Email

Written By

J. Warner Wallace is a Dateline featured cold-case homicide detective, popular national speaker and best-selling author. He continues to consult on cold-case investigations while serving as a Senior Fellow at the Colson Center for Christian Worldview. He is also an Adj. Professor of Christian Apologetics at Talbot School of Theology, Biola University, and a faculty member at Summit Ministries. He holds a BA in Design (from CSULB), an MA in Architecture (from UCLA), and an MA in Theological Studies (from Gateway Seminary).

8 Comments

8 Comments

  1. Pingback: Big Bang Cosmology Is Consistent With Scripture? – The Christian Post – Christian Post

  2. Pingback: By the way… Is the Big Bang Theory Anti-Biblical? | By the way ...

  3. Pingback: Who Created God? | Cold Case Christianity

  4. Pingback: The Top Ten Cold-Case Christianity Articles of 2013 | Cold Case Christianity

  5. Pingback: The Big Thing About the Big Bang | Cold Case Christianity – Reformed faith salsa style

  6. Pingback: URL

  7. Martin

    September 9, 2021 at 2:16 am

    I liked this article and thought it very fair but then considered that the trouble with the Big bang cosmology is that in this model the earth is created out of fire and is molten when the Bible says that it was out of water in Genesis and through God’s Word. The earth was created before the sun. See https://answersingenesis.org/blogs/ken-ham/2013/05/11/did-god-use-the-supposed-big-bang/

    But I do think it is good to say we know the universe had a beginning- because of God’s Word, science and logic. Jesus often started with the Word. He is that Word that created everything. He said “In the beginning God created them male and female” which implies he believed everything in Genesis as literally true.

  8. gary a Kukis

    August 1, 2023 at 10:23 am

    I had heard that something akin to the Big Bang Theory had been proposed by some theologians before this was “accepted” by science. So far, I have only come across someone who wrote during the 1900s.

    Are you aware of anyone proposed this previous to the 1900s?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like

Christianity

In this episode of the Cold-Case Christianity Podcast, J. Warner asks an important question: If you’re a Christian, why is this the case? How...

Evangelism and Case Making

In this episode of the Cold-Case Christianity Podcast, J. Warner examines the nature of religious experience. Can experiences such as these serve as evidence...

God's Existence

Can the existence of coded information in the genome be explained by merely space, time, matter, physics, and chemistry? If not, what does this...

Podcasts

In this episode of the Cold-Case Christianity Podcast, J. Warner talks about the importance of presuppositions when considering a truth claim. Using analogies from...