Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

Cold Case Christianity


Is Christianity Intolerant?

Is Christianity Intolerant
Image Credit: Pixabay from Pexels

There is growing cultural skepticism and criticism of all things “Christian”. At times like this, the issue of religious “tolerance” is sometimes raised and examined. Christians are often called intolerant, especially when examined under a new definition of tolerance that has emerged in our culture. How should we respond when people call us “intolerant” simply because we refuse to embrace a particular value or behavior?

FIRST: Help People Understand “Classic” Tolerance says that tolerance is “a tolerating or being tolerant, esp. of views, beliefs, practices, etc. of others that differ from one’s own”. And when asked what it is to tolerate something, the same source says that we ‘tolerate’ someone when we “recognize and respect (others’ beliefs, practices, etc.) without sharing them”. says that ‘tolerating’ is “to put up with” or “endure” something.

Now did you notice something here? In order for ‘tolerance’ to exist and to be demonstrated, several things are required. Let’s take a look at the list of pre-requisites for ‘tolerance’:

1. Two or more people must exist
2. These folks must hold divergent views, beliefs or practices. In other words, they must DISAGREE.
3. These same folks must endure one another. In other words, they cannot eliminate each other even though they don’t embrace each other’s beliefs, but must instead find a way to peacefully co-exist.

You see, ‘tolerance’, under this classic view, requires a disagreement. Without the disagreement, ‘tolerance’ is not even possible. Now let’s take a look at a new accepted view of tolerance that has emerged in our relativistic culture.

Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.

NEXT: Help People See How The Definition of Tolerance Has Been Corrupted begins to hint at the subtle shift in definition when it describes ‘tolerance’ as “a disposition to allow freedom of choice and behavior.” In its ‘Declaration on the Principles of Tolerance’, the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) defines ‘tolerance’ as “respect, acceptance and appreciation of the rich diversity of our world’s cultures, our forms of expression and ways of being human.”

Notice the shift? The concept (and the actual word) ‘acceptance’ has been added to the definition in a way that subtly transforms the classic definition. This view promotes not that we must ‘endure’ each other in the context of our disagreements, but that we must ‘accept’ and embrace each other’s worldview as equally valuable and equally true. This current definition of ‘tolerance’ could be stated in the following way:

Tolerance: “The act of recognizing and accepting the equal validity and value of all views, beliefs and actions.”

FINALLY: Help People See the Self-Defeating Nature of the New Definition
This new definition of ‘tolerance’ cannot live up to its own standard. What if I hold (and practice) the belief that ‘all views, beliefs and actions are NOT equally valid and valuable’? Could the new, corrupted definition of ‘tolerance’ tolerate my position? No, clearly my position would be the one position that would have to be abolished in order for the new, corrupted definition of ‘tolerance’ to be true. But rejecting my view entirely would simultaneously reject the new definition itself. You see, this corrupted view of tolerance simply cannot stand up under the weight of its own standard. The world presently embraces a view of ‘tolerance’ that is illogical, unsustainable and self-refuting.

It’s our job to help people think clearly about the issue of tolerance, even as we continue to love and tolerate their opposing views (I mean that in the ‘classic’ sense of tolerance!) It's our job to help people think clearly about the issue of tolerance, even as we continue to love and tolerate their opposing views. Share on X

For more information about the reliability of the New Testament gospels and the case for Christianity, please read Cold-Case Christianity: A Homicide Detective Investigates the Claims of the Gospels (Updated and Revised Edition!). This book teaches readers ten principles of cold-case investigations and applies these strategies to investigate the claims of the gospel authors. The book is accompanied by an eight-session Cold-Case Christianity DVD Set (and Participant’s Guide) to help individuals or small groups examine the evidence and make the case.

Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.
Print Friendly, PDF & Email
Written By

J. Warner Wallace is a Dateline featured cold-case homicide detective, popular national speaker and best-selling author. He continues to consult on cold-case investigations while serving as a Senior Fellow at the Colson Center for Christian Worldview. He is also an Adj. Professor of Christian Apologetics at Talbot School of Theology, Biola University, and a faculty member at Summit Ministries. He holds a BA in Design (from CSULB), an MA in Architecture (from UCLA), and an MA in Theological Studies (from Gateway Seminary).



  1. Pingback: Is Christianity Intolerant? | Cold Case Christianity – Elders Scrolls

  2. Nico

    August 5, 2023 at 10:14 pm

    Thank you,

    I was not aware of the shift in definition though I know words are constantly redefined throughout history.

  3. Stephen Becker

    November 10, 2023 at 2:32 pm

    I still wrestle with this word tolerate because of what seems to me its elusive understanding. I think of the example of Lot given to us in 2 Pet 2:7 and the one of Jezebel in Rev 2:20. Was Lot merely “tolerating” the actions of those around him when his soul was “vexed”? And clearly God took issue with the church in Thyatira for “tolerating” her actions and teachings(of course, this is within the body of Christ and not the world in general, so maybe this context is different). The bottom line is, none of us has the “right” to speak, act, think or believe anyway we wish regardless of what God says in His Word. Otherwise, on what ground would God be justified in judging us for anything?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like

Evangelism and Case Making

In this podcast, J. Warner responds to a message from a listener related to doubt and agnosticism. How do we know when we have...

God’s Existence

In this podcast, J. Warner examines the evidence of the origin of the universe and relates this evidence to the case for God’s existence....


In this podcast, J. Warner continues an examination of the pro-life arguments he’s used in the past. Jim describes the SLED paradigm popularized by...


In this podcast, J. Warner reads an honest (if not politically correct) comment from an atheist describing the consequence of a consistent atheistic worldview....