Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

Cold Case Christianity

Morality

If Moral Decisions Are Dependent on Circumstances, Are There No Objective Moral Truths?

210When teaching the difference between objective and subjective truth claims to groups across the country, the issue of moral truth is often an area of confusion. Are there any objective moral absolutes? As I described previously, moral actions (such as killing) are sometimes justified under certain circumstances (i.e. when protecting the life of an innocent child). The Bible affirms this reasoning and scripture allows for similar justification of other moral actions as well. Rahab, for example, hid two Israelite spies from the King of Jericho and lied about their presence in her home (Joshua 2:1-7). The author of Hebrews later included Rahab with other faithful people of faith (Hebrews 11:31), and James also spoke highly of her effort to deceive the King: “In the same way, was not Rahab the harlot also justified by works when she received the messengers and sent them out by another way?” (James 2:25). Rahab’s lie was justified by the same principle scripture uses to justify some homicides. Rahab acted to save the life of two innocent humans; as a result, her actions were warranted.

Moral decisions are often dependent upon the circumstances in which they are made. Does this mean there are no transcendent, objective moral truths? No. Moral justifications are, in fact, evidence of the existence of objective moral facts. We recognize there is something about killing or lying that is objectively wrong, and this is why we seek to justify our actions in the first place. If there was not an innate objective truth about the action, there would be no reason to justify any deviation from this reality. When we find ourselves having to justify our actions, we are acknowledging an objective moral fact. But what are these facts? When teaching groups on the topic, I typically write two or three moral claims on the board:

Killing Is Never “OK”
Lying Is Never “OK”

Since we’ve already discussed the circumstances that might justify such actions (and provided some Biblical examples), most attendees immediately recognize the problem with these first two claims. There are times (albeit very few) when either of these two behaviors might be justified. But the justifications for these actions reveal a foundational truth better expressed in the following way:

Killing “for the Fun of It” Is Never “OK”
Lying “for the Fun of It” Is Never “OK”

When we simply insert the expression “for the fun of it” into our descriptions of these moral actions, we discover the objective moral absolutes foundational to the claims. In other words, we’ve just discovered two objective moral absolutes: “It’s never OK to kill or lie without proper justification.” Our own human experience confirms these truths. Regardless of geographic location, place in history or form of culture, it’s never been morally acceptable to kill or lie without proper justification. Humans have historically recognized these two objective moral absolutes; these principles transcend culture, location and history. The presence of objective, transcendent moral truths ought to cause us to think deeply about their source. All laws require law givers. Transcendent laws require transcendent law givers. Click To Tweet

The presence of objective, transcendent moral truths ought to cause us to think deeply about their source. All laws require law givers. Transcendent laws require transcendent law givers. That’s why the existence of objective moral truths is an excellent evidence for the existence of God, the transcendent Law Giver whose very nature is reflected in the moral laws we still enforce today.

For more information about the scientific and philosophical evidence pointing to a Divine Creator, please read God’s Crime Scene: A Cold-Case Detective Examines the Evidence for a Divinely Created Universe. This book employs a simple crime scene strategy to investigate eight pieces of evidence in the universe to determine the most reasonable explanation. The book is accompanied by an eight-session God’s Crime Scene DVD Set (and Participant’s Guide) to help individuals or small groups examine the evidence and make the case.

J. Warner Wallace is a Dateline featured Cold-Case Detective, Senior Fellow at the Colson Center for Christian Worldview, Adj. Professor of Christian Apologetics at Talbot School of Theology, Biola University, author of Cold-Case ChristianityGod’s Crime Scene, and Forensic Faith, and creator of the Case Makers Academy for kids.

Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.

Subscribe to J. Warner’s Daily Email

Save

Save

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
Written By

J. Warner Wallace is a Dateline featured cold-case homicide detective, popular national speaker and best-selling author. He continues to consult on cold-case investigations while serving as a Senior Fellow at the Colson Center for Christian Worldview. He is also an Adj. Professor of Christian Apologetics at Talbot School of Theology, Biola University, and a faculty member at Summit Ministries. He holds a BA in Design (from CSULB), an MA in Architecture (from UCLA), and an MA in Theological Studies (from Gateway Seminary).

14 Comments

14 Comments

  1. Pingback: Objective Truth Is One Thing, But Objective Moral Truth Is Another | Cold Case Christianity

  2. Pingback: Three M’s That Naturalism Can’t Provide | Cold Case Christianity

  3. Pingback: Treating the Gospel Like a Cookie Rather Than a Cure | Cold Case Christianity

  4. Pingback: Are Objective Moral Truths Merely a Matter of Cultural Agreement? | Cold Case Christianity

  5. Pingback: Does Disagreement Prove There Are No Objective Moral Truths? | The Christian Apologetics Alliance

  6. Pingback: The Self-Evident Nature of Objective Moral Truths | Cold Case Christianity

  7. Pingback: Objective Truth Is One Thing, But Objective Moral Truth Is Another (Repost) | Cold Case Christianity

  8. Pingback: Is “Right” and “Wrong” Simply a Matter of “Human Flourishing”? | Cold Case Christianity

  9. Pingback: Does Disagreement Prove There Are No Objective Moral Truths? | Cold Case Christianity

  10. Pingback: Two Signs From Your Opposition Your Argument Is Sound | Cold Case Christianity

  11. Pingback: Evidence for God from Objective Moral Truth | Anchor Apologetics – Engaging the Church and Culture with Answers from a Christian Worldview

  12. Pingback: Treating the Gospel Like a Cookie Rather Than a Cure | TLG Christian News

  13. Pingback: Midweek Apologetics Roundup - Hope's Reason

  14. Pingback: My reading list for May 14-20, 2017 | Clay on the Wheel

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Advertisement

You May Also Like

Biblical Reliability

Skeptics sometimes argue that the Christianity in its early years looked different than modern-day Christianity. Specifically, they question whether Jesus claimed to be God...

Truth

Are all truth claims simply “perspectival”? Is everything a matter of opinion? If not, what difference would objective truth make when considering Christianity? Detective...

Truth

Is anything REALLY true? Are all truths simply a matter of perspective, culture or “lived experience”? If transcendent truths exist, how can we “ground”...

God / Theism

I recently overheard a conversation about racial injustices which had occurred in the past in America. One of the people taking part in the...