Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

Cold Case Christianity

Objections of Atheism

Four Self-Refuting Statements Heard on College Campuses Across America

101If I began this post by asserting, “I can’t write a word of English,” you’d probably recognize the contradiction. My sentence betrays its own claim, doesn’t it? Such is the nature of self-refuting statements. Wikipedia describes such utterances as “statements whose falsehood is a logical consequence of the act or situation of holding them to be true.” You might be surprised how often people are prone to saying something that is self-refuting, but there are number of common statements we hear (or use) every day that fall into this category:

“Don’t bother me, I am asleep right now”
“I’m not going to respond to that”
“I can’t talk to you right now” You might be surprised how often people are prone to saying something that is self-refuting, but there are number of common statements we hear (or use) every day that fall into this category Click To Tweet

There are times when our words collapse under their own weight. As I train university aged Christians around the country and listen carefully to their common college experiences, I’ve started to collect some of the more popular self-refuting statements uttered by college professors. Here are the top four:

“There is no objective truth” / “Objective truth does not exist”
Perhaps the most obviously self-refuting, this claim (or something similar to it) is still uttered in many university settings according to the students I train. Like all self-refuting claims, it can be cross-checked by simply turning the statement on itself. By asking, “Is that statement objectively true?” we can quickly see that the person making the claim believes in at least one objective truth: that there is no objective truth. See the problem?

“If objective truth does exist, no one could ever know with confidence what it is” / “It’s arrogant to assume you know the truth with certainty”
Once again, the professor who makes such a claim appears to be confident and certain of one truth: that no one can be confident or certain of the truth! The statement falls on its own sword the moment it is uttered.

“Science is the only way to determine truth” / “I only trust things I can determine through a scientific process”
University students report this statement often, and it may take a little more thought to recognize as self-refuting. When a professor makes this claim, we simply need to ask, “Can science determine if that statement (about science) is true?” or “What scientific experiment provided that conclusion for you?” It turns out that there is no scientific process or procedure can be employed to validate this claim. It is a presumptive philosophical statement that is outside the analysis of science.

“It’s intolerant to presume that your view is better than someone else’s’” / “Tolerance requires us to accept all views equally”
An even more hidden self-refuting statement lurks here in this common errant definition of tolerance. Folks who hold to this corrupted view say they accept all views as equally true. But if you make the claim that some ideas are patently false and have less value than others, they will quickly reject your statement. In other words, they will accept any view as equally valuable except your claim that some views are not equally valuable. See the inconsistency? People who embrace this definition of tolerance cannot consistently implement their own view of tolerance.

This last claim related to tolerance may be the future battleground of self-refutation. Most of us, as Christians, recognize this assertion and have been accused of intolerance at one time or another. The exclusive claims of Christianity related to salvation (through faith in Christ alone) place us in the bulls-eye for such criticism. In my next post, I’ll examine the true nature of tolerance as we help each other navigate the concept and learn to defend the classic definition.

Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.

For more information about strategies to help you teach Christian worldview to the next generation, please read So the Next Generation Will Know: Training Young Christians in a Challenging World. This book teaches parents, youth pastors and Christian educators practical, accessible strategies and principles they can employ to teach the youngest Christians the truth of Christianity. The book is accompanied by an eight-session So the Next Generation Will Know DVD Set (and Participant’s Guide) to help individuals or small groups examine the evidence and make the case.

J. Warner Wallace is a Dateline featured Cold-Case Detective, Senior Fellow at the Colson Center for Christian Worldview, Adj. Professor of Christian Apologetics at Talbot School of Theology, Biola University, author of Cold-Case ChristianityGod’s Crime Scene, and Forensic Faith, and creator of the Case Makers Academy for kids.

Subscribe to J. Warner’s Daily Email

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
Written By

J. Warner Wallace is a Dateline featured cold-case homicide detective, popular national speaker and best-selling author. He continues to consult on cold-case investigations while serving as a Senior Fellow at the Colson Center for Christian Worldview. He is also an Adj. Professor of Christian Apologetics at Talbot School of Theology, Biola University, and a faculty member at Summit Ministries. He holds a BA in Design (from CSULB), an MA in Architecture (from UCLA), and an MA in Theological Studies (from Gateway Seminary).

15 Comments

15 Comments

  1. Pingback: Four Self-Refuting Statements Heard on College Campuses Across America | Time For Discernment

  2. Pingback: The Three D’s of Tolerance

  3. Pingback: Quatro afirmações “auto refutantes” ouvidas em faculdades ao redor do mundo « o blog do andrew

  4. Pingback: Quatro afirmações auto refutantes ao redor do mundo « A Voz no Deserto

  5. Pingback: Quatro afirmações “auto refutantes” ouvidas em faculdades ao redor do mundo « A Voz no Deserto

  6. Pingback: A Christian Case Making Strategy for Youth Ministry | Cold Case Christianity

  7. Pingback: Why Christians Hold Truth in High Regard - Cross Examined - Christian Apologetics Ministries | Frank Turek | Christian Apologetics | Christian Apologetics Speakers

  8. Pingback: Why Christians Hold Truth in High Regard | Apologetics ForumApologetics Forum

  9. Pingback: Four Self-Refuting Statements Heard on College Campuses Across America – by J. Warner Wallace | Current Events in Light of the Kingdom of God

  10. Pingback: The Early Bird Gets The Link – Intersections

  11. Pingback: Four Common Self-Refuting Statements Against Christianity and Absolute Truth – Stand For Faith

  12. Pingback: Four Self-Refuting Statements Heard on College Campuses Across America | Cold Case Christianity

  13. Pingback: - Worldview Intersections

  14. Pingback: Four Self-Refuting Statements Heard on College Campuses Across America - Worldview Intersections

  15. Pingback: Four Self-Refuting Statements Heard on College Campuses Across America | Cold Case Christianity – Reformed faith salsa style

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like

God's Existence

Has science already demonstrated that we are nothing more than physical beings? Can we believe in the soul, yet still accept what science teaches...

Truth

Are all truth claims simply “perspectival”? Is everything a matter of opinion? If not, what difference would objective truth make when considering Christianity? Detective...

Christianity

Can Mormonism pass the same test J. Warner applied to Christianity? Are the claims of Mormonism evidentially reasonable? In this Q and A session,...

Christianity

Even a casual reading of the gospels reveals passages that differ from one another when describing the same event. Are these irreconcilable contradictions? How...