Why Naturalistic Explanations for the Resurrection Are… Lame (Video)

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

When atheists account for the claims related to the Resurrection of Jesus, they take a variety of approaches. Why are these naturalistic explanations inadequate to explain the central event of the Christian worldview? In this interview with Joel Settecase from the Think Institute, J. Warner discusses the Resurrection and the explanations offered. Be sure to subscribe to Joel’s Think Institute Podcast!

To see more training videos with J. Warner Wallace, visit the YouTube playlist.

For more information about the reliability of the New Testament gospels and the case for Christianity, please read Cold-Case Christianity: A Homicide Detective Investigates the Claims of the Gospels. This book teaches readers ten principles of cold-case investigations and applies these strategies to investigate the claims of the gospel authors. The book is accompanied by an eight-session Cold-Case Christianity DVD Set (and Participant’s Guide) to help individuals or small groups examine the evidence and make the case.

J. Warner Wallace is a Dateline featured Cold-Case Detective, Senior Fellow at the Colson Center for Christian Worldview, Adj. Professor of Christian Apologetics at Talbot School of Theology, Biola University, author of Cold-Case ChristianityGod’s Crime Scene, and Forensic Faith, and creator of the Case Makers Academy for kids.

Subscribe to J. Warner’s Daily Email

Check Also

Did the Resurrection Really Occur? (Video)

How can we be sure that Jesus rose from the grave? What process could we …

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *