J. Warner Wallace, author of Cold-Case Christianity, was interviewed by Bobby Conway (The One Minute Apologist) and discussed the important distinction between direct and indirect (circumstantial) evidence. This distinction is important because many people denigrate the value of circumstantial evidence. This form of evidence important and valuable in determining a truth claim and can be used to make the case for the Christian worldview. (For more information related to Bobby’s great ministry, visit: http://oneminuteapologist.com/)
To see more training videos with J. Warner Wallace, visit the YouTube playlist.
For more information about the nature of Biblical faith and a strategy for communicating the truth of Christianity, please read Forensic Faith: A Homicide Detective Makes the Case for a More Reasonable, Evidential Christian Faith. This book teaches readers four reasonable, evidential characteristics of Christianity and provides a strategy for sharing Christianity with others. The book is accompanied by an eight-session Forensic Faith DVD Set (and Participant’s Guide) to help individuals or small groups examine the evidence and make the case.
J. Warner Wallace is a Dateline featured Cold-Case Detective, Senior Fellow at the Colson Center for Christian Worldview, Adj. Professor of Christian Apologetics at Talbot School of Theology, Biola University, author of Cold-Case Christianity, God’s Crime Scene, and Forensic Faith, and creator of the Case Makers Academy for kids.
Subscribe to J. Warner’s Daily Email
Pingback: Why Do We Need To Understand Circumstantial Evidence? (Video) | TLG Christian News
Pingback: Do I Need Scientific, Forensic Evidence to Prove Christianity Is True? | Social Apologetics