Why Shouldn’t We Trust the Non-Canonical “Arabic Gospel of the Infancy of the Savior”?

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

The Arabic Gospel of the Infancy of the Savior is an ancient text purportedly providing detail about the childhood of Jesus. But is this non-biblical text reliable? Was it really written by eyewitnesses who observed Jesus as a child? There are four attributes of reliable eyewitness testimony, and the first requirement is simply that the account be old enough to actually be written by someone who was present to see what he or she reported. The Arabic Gospel of the Infancy of the Savior was written too late in history to have been written by anyone who would have truly known Jesus, and like other late non-canonical texts, this fictional account was rejected by the early Church. In spite of this, The Arabic Gospel of the Infancy of the Savior still references accurate det­ails related to Jesus.  Although it is a legendary fabrication written by an author hoped to provide detail about the childhood of Jesus, much can still be learned about the historic Jesus from this late text:

The Arabic Gospel of the Infancy of the Savior (450-550AD)
This Infancy Gospel (like other apocryphal Infancy Gospels) was likely written to satisfy the curiosity of those who wanted more detail related to the childhood of Jesus. It appears to be a compilation written originally in Syriac and then later translated into Arabic, and it clearly draws from (and amplifies) information from prior Infancy Gospels. The document borrows heavily from The Infancy Gospel of James for material related to the Virgin Mary, from The Infancy Gospel of Thomas for material related to the childhood of Jesus, and then provides additional information (from an unknown source) related to the flight of the Holy Family into Egypt.

Why Isn’t It Considered Reliable?
This text appears very late in history; scholars date the compilation to the 5th-6th centuries. It is first mentioned by Isho’dad of Merv, (a 9th century Church leader in the Syrian Church) in his commentary on the Gospel of Matthew. The text contains a number of obvious embellishments on the Infancy Gospels of Thomas and James, two documents that already appear too late in history to contain true eyewitness accounts. The Arabic Gospel of the Infancy of the Savior is a late fictional account drawing from other fictional documents from the apocrypha.

How Does It Corroborate the Life of Jesus?
Like the other apocryphal Infancy Gospels, The Arabic Gospel of the Infancy of the Savior assumes and acknowledges the canonical Gospels prior to filling in details of Jesus’ childhood. Jesus is identified as “Master”, “Saviour”, the “Lord Jesus Christ” and “Savior of the World”. He is described as a miracle worker who harnesses the power of God from a very young age. He is also described as incredibly wise beyond His years and as someone who continues to stump the Rabbis and teachers. The canonical nativity narrative is repeated here: Joseph and Mary return to Bethlehem for the census, Jesus’ birth is heralded by angels, the Shepherds celebrate in the fields, Jesus is visited by Magi who bring gifts and adore Him, Herod attempts to destroy Jesus and the Holy family eventually escapes to Egypt. Following the birth of Jesus, the story of Simeon’s adoration is repeated in this text. Other theological concepts (such as the Trinity) are affirmed as well. The text ends where the canonical Gospels pick up the story of Jesus, at His baptism and the beginning of His public ministry.

Where (and Why) Does It Differ from the Reliable Accounts?
The Infancy Gospels of James and Thomas are clearly source material for this text, and scenes from these two fictitious works are repeated and amplified by The Arabic Gospel of the Infancy of the Savior. In addition to repeating the stories described in The Infancy Gospel of Thomas related to the miracles Jesus reportedly performed as a child, this text adds a number of fanciful elements. As an example, a diaper belonging to Jesus has the ability to heal and even His sweat is magical in its ability to become a curing balm that heals leprosy. The text also describes Jesus meeting several characters as a child who will reappear in significant ways when Jesus is a man. As an example, The Arabic Gospel of the Infancy of the Savior reports that Jesus met Judas Iscariot and cast a demon from him as a boy. Interestingly, many of these stories about Jesus as a child in Egypt also appear in the Quran, as The Arabic Gospel of the Infancy of the Savior appears to have had widespread influence in the Arab world. The writers of the Quran then incorporated the stories in to the text without realizing that they were late fabrications.

This ancient non-canonical text is a late, fictional narrative. When examined under the criteria we use to determine eyewitness reliability, it fails the test. The four canonical Gospels (Mark, Matthew, Luke and John) are still the earliest reliable record of Jesus, written within the lifetimes of the eyewitnesses who knew Jesus personally.

J. Warner Wallace is a Cold-Case Detective, Christian Case Maker, Senior Fellow at the Colson Center for Christian Worldview, and the author of Cold-Case Christianity, Cold-Case Christianity for Kids, God’s Crime Scene, God’s Crime Scene for Kids, and Forensic Faith.

Comment or Subscribe to J. Warner’s Daily Email

Check Also

Why Shouldn’t We Trust the Non-Canonical “Gospel of Nicodemus” or “The Acts of Pilate”?

The Gospel of Nicodemus is an ancient text purportedly written by the man who visited …